0 
0 
The piracy of sports broadcasts has consequences on the value of the competition and television channels face competition from illegal players.
Piracy of sports content is growing: 17% of Internet users aged 15 and over used illegal means in 2019 to access online sports content. It is 해외축구중계 that has concentrated the majority of illicit consumption of live streaming content . The fragmentation of the offer and the price considered high by viewers are considered to be the major reasons for this development.
During the health crisis in 2020, an average of 12.7 million Internet users visited a site or application each month to consume illicit online cultural goods (including sports broadcasts), i.e. 24% of Internet users.
The law of October 25, 2021 on the regulation and protection of access to cultural works in the digital age plans to strengthen the fight against the piracy of cultural and sports audiovisual programs.
In order to fight against sports streaming sites , a referral mechanism (in an emergency) is planned for the benefit of holders of rights to broadcast sports events. The new system, introduced into the sports code, takes account of the urgency inherent in live audiovisual broadcasts of sporting events ( live streaming ), the damage being, in this situation, instantaneous and irreversible. It therefore does not attack consumers but the sites themselves, which will be closed with the support of internet service providers and search engines.
The new system, introduced into the sports code, takes into account the urgency inherent in live 해외축구중계 audiovisual broadcasts of sporting events (“live streaming”), the damage being, in this situation, instantaneous and irreversible.
The system is open to holders of the right of audiovisual exploitation of a competition or a sports event (provided for by the sports code), namely the sports federations and the organizers of the sports events mentioned with regard to the sports events or competitions that they organize, and the assignees of this right if necessary, namely audiovisual communication companies and professional sports leagues, in the event that they are assignees of the marketing of the audiovisual exploitation rights of professional sports competitions.
The president of the court may in particular decide to block, for each of the days appearing on the official competition calendar, the services illegally broadcasting the sports competition, whether or not they have been identified at the decision stage.
These measures are, however, temporary and thus come to an end at the end of the authorized broadcast of the competition.
To implement and update these measures for the duration of the injunction, it is the responsibility of the rights holder concerned to communicate to the authority the identification data of the services in question. The sworn agents of A must then either note the broadcast of the competition or the sporting event to be protected on the service in question or note that this service has such a broadcast as its main objective or one of the main objectives. The Authority then notifies the identification data of this service to the persons mentioned in the judicial blocking order. In the event of difficulty, the court may be seized, in summary proceedings or on request, to order any measure capable of stopping access to these services.
